Biden says gun legislation won't make difference in mass shootings?
Post ReplyPost New TopicPosted 2/7/2013 by CnBsmommy in NSBR Board
 

CnBsmommy
PeaAddict

PeaNut 308,331
April 2007
Posts: 1,098
Layouts: 0
Loc: Southwest

Posted: 2/7/2013 5:16:29 PM
Did he really realize that new laws won't make difference because existing laws aren't enforced?

Biden

ETA: isn't the mass shootings what people are really concerned about?

Mrs_Tyler
Sorting Laundry

PeaNut 197,836
March 2005
Posts: 24,059
Layouts: 246
Loc: Enjoying the humid continental climate zone.

Posted: 2/7/2013 6:14:58 PM
Wow. I actually agree with Joe Biden.


Krazyscrapper
StuckOnPeas

PeaNut 131,612
February 2004
Posts: 2,060
Layouts: 0
Loc: Sonoma County

Posted: 2/7/2013 6:29:27 PM

Curbing guns can't ensure an end to mass slayings like December's killings of 20 first-graders in Newtown, Conn., but it will reduce firearm deaths, Vice President Joe Biden said Thursday.


This is a true statement and The President has said this from the very beginning so I don't know why anyone should be surprised or think its something new.

And I'm concerned about all gun deaths. Including the one that just happened where a couple got into a fight and the husband left to cool off and came home to find his wife had shot all three of their children and then herself. One child is still alive but in a coma.

Shih Tzu Mommy
Million dollar camera, 10 dollar lock!

PeaNut 224,352
September 2005
Posts: 23,525
Layouts: 0
Loc: Right here

Posted: 2/7/2013 6:30:10 PM

Wow. I actually agree with Joe Biden
Satan must be getting a winter coat fitted. I do, too!



Dog people are a special breed!

Enough
PeaNut

PeaNut 553,030
April 2012
Posts: 443
Layouts: 0

Posted: 2/7/2013 6:43:53 PM

And I'm concerned about all gun deaths. Including the one that just happened where a couple got into a fight and the husband left to cool off and came home to find his wife had shot all three of their children and then herself. One child is still alive but in a coma.
Don't you realize if she didn't have a gun she could have drowned them in the bathtub, sent the car with them in it, into a lake, torched the house, etc? Not having a gun wouldn't have prevented this woman from doing what she set out to do. Having a gun in the house isn't what makes troubled people snap.

So you're only concerned if she shoots them, not if she kills them with another method?


Krazyscrapper
StuckOnPeas

PeaNut 131,612
February 2004
Posts: 2,060
Layouts: 0
Loc: Sonoma County

Posted: 2/7/2013 7:14:07 PM
Enough that arguement doesn't hold water. Drowning someone is messy and takes time. Ah but a gun is fast, efficent, and gets the job done in a matter of a very few minutes...

And I believe, and you really don't have a strong arguement to dispute this, if there had not been a gun or guns in that house ALL the family members would alive tonight.

Krazyscrapper
StuckOnPeas

PeaNut 131,612
February 2004
Posts: 2,060
Layouts: 0
Loc: Sonoma County

Posted: 2/7/2013 7:14:39 PM
Enough that arguement doesn't hold water. Drowning someone is messy and takes time. Ah but a gun is fast, efficent, and gets the job done in a matter of a very few minutes...

And I believe, and you really don't have a strong arguement to dispute this, if there had not been a gun or guns in that house ALL the family members would alive tonight.

Mrs_Tyler
Sorting Laundry

PeaNut 197,836
March 2005
Posts: 24,059
Layouts: 246
Loc: Enjoying the humid continental climate zone.

Posted: 2/7/2013 7:59:10 PM

Enough that arguement doesn't hold water. Drowning someone is messy and takes time.

I hope the pun was unintentional.
I recall a case from not so many years back about a mom who drove her car into a river to drown her children. Mental illness will drive a person to do some horrific things to people they love regardless of the weapon at their disposal.

Fact- we already have guns in the US.
Fact- no ban will remove all the guns in the US.
Fact- tighter gun control laws won't eliminate acts of violence due to guns or any other weapon.

And you cannot say for certain that the mother in your story would not have killed her children in some other way if there hadn't been a gun available.

Prayers for the family of those precious children.

FlaMom
Thread Killer Extraordinaire

PeaNut 29,166
February 2002
Posts: 6,006
Layouts: 12
Loc: BFE

Posted: 2/7/2013 8:07:01 PM
The name Andrea Yates mean anything to you, Krazyscrapper?


Tammy


joyce22
PeaAddict

PeaNut 140,960
April 2004
Posts: 1,143
Layouts: 0

Posted: 2/7/2013 9:46:14 PM
Mrs. tyler - I think you're referring to the Susan Smith case in South Carolina. She did it thinking that would be the way to get her boyfriend back (she may have been married at the time). The boyfriend quit having anything to do with her and she thought it was because of her boys. Anyway, I don't believe she was mentally ill. She just wanted the boyfriend more than she wanted her kids.

IScrapCrap
PeaAddict

PeaNut 570,639
October 2012
Posts: 1,025
Layouts: 0
Loc: pea formerly known as GIPfunny
Posted: 2/7/2013 9:53:11 PM
I agree with Biden. And All Andrea Yates needed to kill her children was her hands and a bathtub. I am for some legislation, but do not see how many mass shootings could have been prevented. We also need mental health legislation or these gun control laws will be in vain.


The pea formerly known as GIPfunny

desertpea
StuckOnPeas

PeaNut 359,474
January 2008
Posts: 2,190
Layouts: 41
Loc: Moving!

Posted: 2/7/2013 10:13:05 PM
And since the below the radar lunatics hell bent on killing as many people possible get to walk around with guns, guess what? I have a constitutional right to protect myself from them by carrying a gun -- and I'm trained to do so.

Krazyscrapper sounds exactly like that basket case ex-LAPD officer running around killing people in California.

Enough
PeaNut

PeaNut 553,030
April 2012
Posts: 443
Layouts: 0

Posted: 2/7/2013 10:23:14 PM

And I believe, and you really don't have a strong arguement to dispute this, if there had not been a gun or guns in that house ALL the family members would alive tonight.
I do have a strong argument. It's got a name. Filicide. And one of the 5 categories is Spouse Revenge Filicide. And most don't use a gun.



leftturnonly
Will trade mosquitoes for cookies.

PeaNut 416,788
March 2009
Posts: 19,567
Layouts: 0
Loc: Living in Kim's Perfect World, again.

Posted: 2/7/2013 10:32:29 PM

And I believe, and you really don't have a strong arguement to dispute this, if there had not been a gun or guns in that house ALL the family members would alive tonight.


Andrea Yates' 5 children are all dead from being drowned in their bathtub, so your point is totally without merit.






If PC is the way to get to Heaven, I'm going straight to Hell.



**Angie**
Pea Who Should Be Cleaning!

PeaNut 145,006
May 2004
Posts: 10,835
Layouts: 91
Loc: at home in front of the computer

Posted: 2/7/2013 10:40:12 PM

Anyway, I don't believe she was mentally ill. She just wanted the boyfriend more than she wanted her kids.


You think that someone who killed her children ISN'T mentally ill?





Shih Tzu Mommy
Million dollar camera, 10 dollar lock!

PeaNut 224,352
September 2005
Posts: 23,525
Layouts: 0
Loc: Right here

Posted: 2/7/2013 10:58:27 PM

Enough that arguement doesn't hold water. Drowning someone is messy and takes time. Ah but a gun is fast, efficent, and gets the job done in a matter of a very few minutes...

And I believe, and you really don't have a strong arguement to dispute this, if there had not been a gun or guns in that house ALL the family members would alive tonight.
I think you are wrong. Totally wrong.

Andrea Yates, anyone?

How about this guy?

Or this one?
Just because no gun was around, don't feel like no violence would have ensued.



Dog people are a special breed!

Mrs_Tyler
Sorting Laundry

PeaNut 197,836
March 2005
Posts: 24,059
Layouts: 246
Loc: Enjoying the humid continental climate zone.

Posted: 2/8/2013 11:32:39 AM

Anyway, I don't believe she was mentally ill. She just wanted the boyfriend more than she wanted her kids.
-----------------------------------------

You think that someone who killed her children ISN'T mentally ill?

No kidding. That seems like it would be obvious. That would be like saying Adam Lanza wasn't mentally ill- no, he just wanted violence more than he wanted those innocent kids to live.

firepaws
PeaAddict

PeaNut 301,913
March 2007
Posts: 1,057
Layouts: 3
Loc: Missing my mountains and the smell of fresh cedar and pine

Posted: 2/8/2013 12:27:16 PM
I agree with him too. Basically because MOST of the gun violence is from hand guns not assault rifles. The criminals and wackos are not going to obey the laws. Sad but true.

sharonmnc
Ancient Ancestor of Pea

PeaNut 39,386
May 2002
Posts: 6,852
Layouts: 28
Loc: Charlotte, NC

Posted: 2/8/2013 1:18:18 PM
Everyone is fixated on the random events rather than the likely ones. We want assurances that there will be no more mass shootings but there are none. The shooters don't care that their actions are against the law.

You are 17 times more likely to kill a member of your own family than an armed intruder. We can't do anything about the mass shootings, but maybe some of the other deaths can be prevented.a

The whole drowning in the bathtub argument is beside the point. A guy who gets mad at a neighbor doesn't go drown him in the bathtub, but he's more likely to shoot the neighbor if he already has a gun than if he has to think it over and go get trained in firearm safety first.


Sharon

Serving Up Sunshine
My Pinterest
My Smugmug Gallery

D300, D70, Nikon 80-200 f2.8, Tamron 28-75-f2.8, Nikon 18-200, Tokina 12-24, Nikon 10.5mm F/2.8G Fisheye, Nikon 50mm f1.8, Nikon SB800


Enough
PeaNut

PeaNut 553,030
April 2012
Posts: 443
Layouts: 0

Posted: 2/8/2013 2:35:16 PM

A guy who gets mad at a neighbor doesn't go drown him in the bathtub, but he's more likely to shoot the neighbor if he already has a gun than if he has to think it over and go get trained in firearm safety first.
Like a lot of folks, you seem to be under the impression that the gun drives the behavior.



birukitty
PeaFixture

PeaNut 35,782
April 2002
Posts: 3,565
Layouts: 1

Posted: 2/8/2013 3:42:44 PM
Joe Biden did NOT say gun legislation won't make a difference in mass shootings.

What he said was this, "Nothing we are going to do is going to fundamentally alter or eliminate the possibility of another mass shooting or guarantee that we will bring gun deaths down to a thousand a year from what it is now".

This is how I interpret the above-Nothing we do is going to eliminate the possibility of another mass shooting. Another mass shooting will happen. I agree with that. It's logical.

The second part-"or guarantee that we will bring gun deaths down to a thousand a year from what it is now". Since the total of gun deaths in 2012 in the USA was thirty thousand it's logical that you can't bring that down to a thousand no matter what new laws are enacted.

Debbie in MD.

Krazyscrapper
StuckOnPeas

PeaNut 131,612
February 2004
Posts: 2,060
Layouts: 0
Loc: Sonoma County

Posted: 2/8/2013 6:18:33 PM
Enough in some cases the gun does drive the behavior. Several weeks ago a kid took, I think, a shotgun to school and shot one or two boys that were bullying him. It would appear he felt the only way he could handle his tormentors was with a gun he had access to.

I have said before I believe guns give some people false courage. People got upset when I said it but I think its true.

scrappower
Allons-y Alonso

PeaNut 174,150
October 2004
Posts: 12,976
Layouts: 0

Posted: 2/8/2013 6:26:41 PM

A guy who gets mad at a neighbor doesn't go drown him in the bathtub, but he's more likely to shoot the neighbor if he already has a gun than if he has to think it over and go get trained in firearm safety first.
Like a lot of folks, you seem to be under the impression that the gun drives the behavior.




The gun can make it easier, quicker and less physical way of killing someone.




Blessed Be!

Enough
PeaNut

PeaNut 553,030
April 2012
Posts: 443
Layouts: 0

Posted: 2/11/2013 12:28:01 AM

Enough in some cases the gun does drive the behavior. Several weeks ago a kid took, I think, a shotgun to school and shot one or two boys that were bullying him. It would appear he felt the only way he could handle his tormentors was with a gun he had access to.
Even in that case, the gun did not drive the behavior. It is merely a tool to carry out the chosen behavior.


Post Reply . Post New TopicShow/Hide Icons . Show/Hide Signatures
 
Hide
{{ title }}
{{ icon }}
{{ body }}
{{ footer }}